Research has found that nonreplicable publications are cited more often than replicable publications.
Notes on verification
Confirmed by peer-reviewed Science Advances study (Serra-Garcia & Gneezy 2021) and corroborated by independent science journalism and a related PNAS study; findings consistent across sources. [cascade flags: aggregator_dropped_primary_exists | tier=silver indep_score=0.983 clusters=3 claim_tier=notable]
Sources
- Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science (seed:psychology_and_neuroscience)
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abd1705 (corroboration)
- https://www.timeshighereducation.com/science/studies-fail-replicate-get-more-citations (corroboration)
- https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2304862120 (corroboration)