In 2016, Daniel Gilbert, Gary King, Stephen Pettigrew, and Timothy Wilson published a comment in Science arguing that the Open Science Collaboration article contained three major statistical errors.
Notes on verification
Confirmed via PubMed, Science.org, and ResearchGate, all matching the claim's details on authorship, publication, and content. [tier=gold indep_score=0.983 clusters=3 claim_tier=notable]
Sources
- Comment on 'Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science' (seed:psychology_and_neuroscience)
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aad7243 (corroboration)
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26941311/ (corroboration)
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296701014_Response_to_Comment_on_Estimating_the_reproducibility_of_psychological_science (corroboration)