Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, and Wilson's comment states that correcting the statistical errors in the Open Science Collaboration article provides no evidence of a replication crisis in psychological science.
Notes on verification
Directly confirmed by the primary source (Gilbert, King, Pettigrew & Wilson, Science 2016) and corroborated by Harvard publication page and PubMed listing. Note this is a contested academic claim within an ongoing scientific debate, not a settled consensus fact. [tier=silver indep_score=1.0 clusters=2 claim_tier=notable]
Sources
- Comment on 'Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science' (seed:psychology_and_neuroscience)
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aad7243 (corroboration)
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26941311/ (corroboration)