Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, and Wilson's 2016 comment states that correcting the statistical errors in the Open Science Collaboration article provides no evidence of a replication crisis in psychological science.
Notes on verification
The claim accurately describes the content of the published Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, and Wilson 2016 Science comment, corroborated by the original publication and independent news coverage. However, the underlying scientific conclusion is contested, as the original OSC authors published a rebuttal disputing this interpretation in the same issue. [tier=silver indep_score=0.925 clusters=2 claim_tier=notable]
Sources
- Comment on 'Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science' (seed:psychology_and_neuroscience)
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aad7243 (corroboration)
- https://www.sciencenews.org/article/psychologys-replication-crisis-sparks-new-debate (corroboration)