Daniel Gilbert, Gary King, Stephen Pettigrew, and Timothy Wilson's 2016 comment argues that the Open Science Collaboration article contains three major statistical errors.
Notes on verification
Directly corroborated by the original Science publication, PubMed abstract, and the authors' own institutional webpage, all using nearly identical language describing three statistical errors. [tier=silver indep_score=1.0 clusters=2 claim_tier=notable]
Sources
- Comment on 'Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science' (seed:psychology_and_neuroscience)
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aad7243 (corroboration)
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26941311/ (corroboration)