Science2009globalhigh confidence

A mathematical model using brain activity from nine control-network areas predicted participants' number of wins in cheating-opportunity trials with almost 80% accuracy in Greene and Paxton's study.

Notes on verification

Confirmed directly from the original PNAS paper (Greene & Paxton, 2009) and PMC full text, which report a model built from the 9 identified control-network regions reduced to 5 regions/7 variables explaining 79% of variance in cheating-opportunity win predictions. [tier=gold indep_score=1.0 clusters=3 claim_tier=notable] [kind-backfill 2026-09-15: kind=attributed eligibility=high]

Sources